Finanssivalvonta

FIN-FSA’s assessment: some consumer lenders fail to manage default risks adequately, shortcomings also in contract terms

Share

The Financial Supervisory Authority (FIN-FSA) has reviewed the management of default risks and conduct by parties granting consumer credit in Finland. Significant differences were identified among the market participants in the management of default risk: other lenders that were transferred under FIN-FSA supervision in July 2023 have significantly more shortcomings in their credit granting practices in comparison with banks. Furthermore, some of the other consumer lenders do not fully comply with legislation on consumer lending in their contract terms. The FIN-FSA will require these entities to remediate the shortcomings identified in the reviews.

Other companies granting consumer credit were transferred under FIN-FSA supervision on 1 July 2023, when the Act on the Registration of Certain Credit Providers and Credit Intermediaries entered into force. In the same context, a new provision on the management of default risk in consumer lending also took effect.

- To ensure the functioning of the financial sector and uphold consumer rights, it is important that all parties granting consumer credit in Finland are supervised based on the same principles. The objective of our expanded supervision in this area is that all market participants comply with common rules, both with respect to the management of default risk and conduct, states Marko Myller, Head of Department for Banking Supervision.

Not all parties manage default risk adequately

Significant differences were identified among parties granting consumer credit in Finland in terms of the management of default risk. Foreign branches and credit institution operating in Finland on a cross-border basis showed significant shortcomings in their lending practices. Some of the other lenders transferred recently under FIN-FSA supervision had even severe shortcomings. However, some shortcomings were also identified among Finnish banks.

The most significant shortcomings were concerned with lending to consumers with an unreasonably high default risk as well as deficiencies in the risk rating systems used by the lenders to assess and monitor default risks associated with consumer lending in a reliable manner.

Some of the lenders applied discriminatory factors in the assessment of credit risks, such as gender or native language. Some had significantly high shares of credit losses or past due exposures as a proportion of their credit portfolio. Some failed to check for bad credit remarks before making a credit decision, while some did not assess the applicant's income or other financial circumstances adequately when granting credit. In addition, shortcomings were found in the retention period of the lending criteria applied. Some of the lenders’ maximum interest rate also exceeded the allowed limit.

Shortcomings found in contract terms

The review of conduct only covered new FIN-FSA supervised entities that actively grant new consumer credit. Preliminary assessment indicates that not all parties comply with all legislation applying to consumer lending in their contract terms. Some shortcomings were identified in individually agreed contract terms concerning the price of credit. While the general terms covered the existence of the consumer's and the lender’s statutory rights appropriately, the details on the preconditions and consequences of invoking these rights were incomplete. In some cases, key contract terms were spread across several documents, making it difficult to form a total view.

FIN-FSA requires remediation of the shortcomings

The FIN-FSA will be in contact with the lenders to ensure that the identified shortcomings are remediated. The FIN-FSA will also use the observations made in the reviews when focusing supervision on other lenders. The observations will also be used in planning periodic reporting needed in the assessment of default risks and in preparing FIN-FSA regulations and guidelines concerning consumer lending.

Review of consumer lenders will continue

The findings described in this release are based on two reviews conducted by the FIN-FSA, one of which is still ongoing.

In autumn 2023, the FIN-FSA launched a review of its new supervised entities to assess the fulfilment of the preconditions for registration, conduct concerning customer protection and compliance with obligations under the AML Act. As regards the fulfilment of the preconditions of registration and obligations under the AML Act, the results will be completed and published later.

In addition, the FIN-FSA carried out a thematic review of the management of default risk by entities granting consumer credit in Finland. These entities include both banks, which were already covered by FIN-FSA supervision, and the other lenders that entered its scope only recently.

For further information, please contact 

Marko Myller, Head of Department
Requests for interviews are coordinated by FIN-FSA Communications, tel. +358 9 183 5030 (weekdays 9:00–16:00).

Contacts

Media phone service number

can be contacted on weekdays 9–16, except on Holy Thursday and New Year’s Eve on 9–13.

Tel:+358 9 183 5030

Links

Finanssivalvonta, or the Financial Supervisory Authority (FIN-FSA), is the authority for supervision of Finland’s financial and insurance sectors. The entities supervised by the authority include banks, insurance and pension companies as well as other companies operating in the insurance sector, investment firms, fund management companies and the Helsinki Stock Exchange. We foster financial stability and confidence in the financial markets and enhance protection for customers, investors and the insured.

Alternative languages

Subscribe to releases from Finanssivalvonta

Subscribe to all the latest releases from Finanssivalvonta by registering your e-mail address below. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Latest releases from Finanssivalvonta

Påföljdsavgift till tre bolag för dröjsmål med anmälan om transaktioner som utförts av personer i ledande ställning17.10.2024 14:00:00 EEST | Pressmeddelande

Finansinspektionen har tilldelat Meriaura Invest Oy och Pokela Oy Iso Omena en påföljdsavgift samt Myvision Oy en gemensam påföljdsavgift för flera försummelser. Bolagen har inte inom utsatt tid lämnat in anmälan om transaktioner för egen räkning till emittenten och Finansinspektionen. Transaktionsanmälan ska lämnas utan dröjsmål och senast tre arbetsdagar efter att transaktionen har utförts. Bolagen är närståendebolag till personer i ledande ställning hos emittenterna.

Seuraamusmaksu kolmelle yhtiölle johtohenkilöiden liiketoimi-ilmoitusten viivästymisistä17.10.2024 14:00:00 EEST | Tiedote

Finanssivalvonta on määrännyt seuraamusmaksun Meriaura Invest Oy:lle ja Pokela Oy Isolle Omenalle sekä useasta laiminlyönnistä yhteisen seuraamusmaksun Myvision Oy:lle. Yhtiöt eivät ole ilmoittaneet määräajassa liikkeeseenlaskijalle ja Finanssivalvonnalle omaan lukuunsa tehdyistä liiketoimista. Liiketoimi-ilmoitus on tehtävä viipymättä ja viimeistään kolme työpäivää liiketoimen toteuttamisen jälkeen. Kyseiset yhtiöt ovat liikkeeseenlaskijoiden johtohenkilöiden lähipiiriyhtiöitä.

Penalty payments to three companies for late notification of managers’ transaction17.10.2024 14:00:00 EEST | Press release

The Financial Supervisory Authority (FIN-FSA) has imposed a penalty payment on Meriaura Invest Oy and Pokela Oy Iso Omena, and a joint penalty payment for several omissions on Myvision Oy. The companies have failed to notify, by the deadline, the issuer and the FIN-FSA of transactions made on their own account. A transaction notification must be made promptly and no later than three business days after the date of the transaction. The companies concerned are closely associated companies of persons discharging managerial responsibilities in issuers.

Skillnader i finländska bankers klassificering av krediter enligt nedskrivningssteg – tillräckliga kreditförlustreserveringar som görs i rätt tid kräver en välfungerande hantering av kreditrisker10.10.2024 15:05:00 EEST | Pressmeddelande

Finansinspektionen har i sin utredning konstaterat skillnader och eventuella brister i finländska bankers klassificering av krediter enligt nedskrivningssteg. Betydelsen av korrekta klassificeringar och en tillräcklig och rättidig redovisning av nedskrivningar framhävs framför allt i den aktuella högriskmiljön. Alltför små kreditförlustreserveringar som gjorts för sent kan leda till större nedskrivningar och försvaga bankernas kapitalställning om riskerna realiseras.

Suomalaispankkien luottojen arvonalentumisluokitteluissa eroja – oikea-aikaiset ja riittävät luottotappiovaraukset edellyttävät toimivaa luottoriskien hallintaa10.10.2024 15:05:00 EEST | Tiedote

Finanssivalvonnan selvityksen perusteella suomalaispankkien luottojen arvonalentumisluokituksissa on havaittu eroavaisuuksia ja mahdollisia puutteita. Asianmukaisten luokittelujen sekä riittävien ja oikea-aikaisten arvonalentumiskirjausten merkitys korostuu etenkin nykyisessä kohonneiden riskien ympäristössä. Liian alhaiset ja myöhässä tehdyt luottotappiovaraukset voivat riskien realisoituessa johtaa suurempiin arvonalentumiskirjauksiin ja heikentää pankkien vakavaraisuusasemaa.

In our pressroom you can read all our latest releases, find our press contacts, images, documents and other relevant information about us.

Visit our pressroom
World GlobeA line styled icon from Orion Icon Library.HiddenA line styled icon from Orion Icon Library.Eye